Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Religion and Science

	Duration: 406 seconds Upload Time: 07-02-28 22:30:11 User: azrienoch :::: Favorites
Description: This is a response to the latest response of the ongoing responses responding to squarecircle's question. Note the 5-foot mound of snow behind me.
Comments
Judelicious1971 ::: Favorites lol. Az and Ron doing it outside! 07-02-28 22:52:52 _____________________________________________________
Balphaus ::: Favorites From what I've seen of this discussion I'd say you're both talking on completely different levels.. Almost as if to you squarecircle was "missing the point" and to him you probably seem to have absurd, illogical pedantic arguments. Thenn again I'm in no position to say what you're both thinking.. But I definately think there's some misunderstanding going on. 07-03-01 21:58:44 _____________________________________________________
azrienoch ::: Favorites Hmm... Perhaps I should do a separate video on just how accessible this concept is. In fact, I've got an idea... 07-03-01 22:27:10 _____________________________________________________
Castaa ::: Favorites I watch this entire discussion. Good to see it happening. It's a hard topic because it appears wording is so important to keep the discussion from getting derailed. What alternate quantity of principles would be used in the place as an alternate but useful scientific principle? Like the principles use to explain of the diversity of life as example used in the previous videos in this discussion. 07-06-17 03:57:32 _____________________________________________________
azrienoch ::: Favorites There's an essay by WVO Quine called "Two Dogmas of Empiricism". Quine is much better at talking about this than I am. 07-06-17 04:00:47 _____________________________________________________
Castaa ::: Favorites Thanks for the reply. I'll check that out. 07-06-17 04:21:53 _____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________